Loading market data…
Is now a better or worse than median moment to deploy capital — and if it isn't clean, which inputs are fighting?
A plain-language summary of the bands above — not a score, and deliberately last. Read the evidence first.
A slow, structural read on where Bitcoin sits — built for capital-deployment decisions made a handful of times a year, not for trading. It shows disagreement rather than hiding it behind a single score.
Every metric is placed by where it sits within its own history — how high or low it is versus everything it's ever been (0 = its lowest ever, 100 = its highest): left = accumulation (historically cheap/washed-out), right = distribution (frothy/expensive). A metric's colour follows the same scale. When a band's inputs fight, it strains and names the outliers.
One exception: Valuation compares against its last 4 years (one Bitcoin cycle), not all of history. Each cycle's peaks run lower than the last, so against 2013's extremes today would always look cheap and a new top might never read expensive.
The faint comet trail behind each mark is where it sat over your chosen lookback — drag the slider up top to sweep from a week out to years, and watch which way each metric is drifting. Where a metric's history is shorter than the lookback, its tail truncates at a neutral data wall rather than pretending to a move it can't show.
Two metrics — volume and gold — have no single honest direction, so they sit grey and uncounted.